Light Bike Vs. Heavy Bike – What’s The Difference On A Climb? GCN Does Science

Light Bike Vs. Heavy Bike – What’s The Difference On A Climb? GCN Does Science


How much of a difference does having a light bike actually make? We put it to the test on the climb to Sestriere.
Subscribe to GCN:

What do you think the difference will be? Let us know in the comments before you see the results!

A light bike always feels faster than a heavy bike on the climbs, but, is the difference as big in the real world as our perception?

We wanted to find out. So, Simon and Matt climbed to Sestriere twice; once on a light bike, once on the same bike weighed down with ballast. Simon recorded his power data, while Matt went for perception, because, after all, a lot of racing, and riding fast is about your mentality.

Do you notice the difference with a light bike? Let us know in the comments.

Music:
Inf – Power Moves B Boy
The Lower 48 – Long Time Coming (Instr)
The Lower 48 – Rabbit Hole (Instr)

Buy GCN Cycling Kit! Click here:
Get GCN T-Shirts and hoodies:

About GCN:

The Global Cycling Network puts you in the centre of the action: from the iconic climbs of Alpe D’Huez and Mont Ventoux to the cobbles of Flanders, everywhere there is road or pavé, world-class racing and pro riders, we will be there bringing you action, analysis and unparalleled access every week, every month, and every year. We show you how to be a better cyclist with our bike maintenance videos, tips for improving your cycling, cycling top tens, and not forgetting the weekly GCN Show. Join us on YouTube’s biggest and best cycling channel to get closer to the action and improve your riding!

Welcome to the Global Cycling Network | Inside cycling

Thanks to our sponsors:

Santini cycling kit:
Kask helmets:
fi’zi:k shoes:
Garmin:
SCOTT bikes:
Ridley:

YouTube Channel –
Facebook –
Google+ –
Twitter –

Leave us a comment below!

Music – licensed by Cue Songs

99 Comments on "Light Bike Vs. Heavy Bike – What’s The Difference On A Climb? GCN Does Science"


  1. since GCN likes to cooky videos, lets see a heavy bike vs light bike downhill. 😀 bet I know who'd win.

    Reply

  2. They would shit themselves if they rode my old mtb with paniers, three waters and the Deliveroo crate attached. Weighs a ton but I ride 60km a day haha

    Reply

  3. If one's goal is general fitness rather than competing then a heavy bike is going to put on the muscles more than a weight-weenie's wobbly job.

    Reply

  4. I'd like to hear the gents comments on the Rohloff 14sp hub gear. My comment: Bit heavier than the filthy derailleur contraptions but the joy of 14 ratios covering 520% (or 5.2:1) – at EQUAL INTERVALS – all in a straight line – instant selection whether moving or stationary makes me never want to go back to the Der derailleur. Acceleration: half a pedal turn and click – 3 or 4 times and I whistle past most der-herberts on take-off no worries. No time lost as the primitive der-man's chain graunches 'orribly cog-climbing over the cassette while he eases off the pressure losing time. I am a convert.

    Reply

  5. Guys.. Ihave java veloce road bike… What a you guys thinking about that bike??? Its good and fast?

    Reply

  6. Between my Specialized crosstrail and Scott speeder I've been doing most of my riding lately on my
    Specialized, it is very heavy compared to my Scott but it is more durable for rides that I'm not familiar with plus it has a rack on it. So I can get stuff done more so then on the road bike; the best is when I go from the heavy one back to the road bike I fly down the roads. So time allowing, I get a heavy work out on the Specialized. But bike what you want to race is what I'm told.

    Reply

  7. I got 13 KG of body fat I need to shed. I can only imagine biking once I get ride of all that extra body fat. That would be riding a 13 KG bike and having it go to 0.

    Reply

  8. A comfortable bike makes a far greater difference for overall riding enjoyment. I prefer more durable components, which typically come at a weight penalty, but are easier on the pocket book. A few pounds doesn't matter in the grand scheme. All that mass eventually goes downhill faster, so you can pick up a few lost seconds. Also, a heavier bike will handle the cross winds better, and it tends to dampen the gusty head winds. Think of a flywheel in a car, a light flywheel spins up faster but since it has little mass, once the power is removed, it slows down fast. A heavy flywheel takes longer to spin up, but once at RMP it has the inertia to keep it spinning. When a gust of wind hits a heavy bike it won't slow it down as much. You're right though, in a pure climbing race, the lighter bike is an advantage over a heavier bike. However, in a long endurance race, a light bike has less meaning, especially when a component breaks. Cool video though. It's nice to know Newton is still right after all these years.

    Reply

  9. One big Word, Cardio Conditioning for Dummies. If your a pro then everything on your bike matters, For all you Punters out there blaming the bike for your short comings. Fuck off

    Reply

  10. It "feels" faster to ride a lighter bike because of the lighter wheels. Rotational mass has a far bigger effect on how you perceive the bike in relation to static mass like your frame. Though this mostly just affects acceleration and climbing not so much sustained speed, that's why a really light bike almost feels like it wants to leap when you really push the pedals. Basically change your wheels for a pair of really light ones and the bike will feel much faster and more fun, though you won't really gain a substantional gain in terms of how much time you saved, that's really down to how strong of a rider you are and also your positioning and effectivness when pedaling combined with stamina. I guess long bike races that last for hours are a exception where time could mean a bigger margin in the long run.

    Reply

  11. My 12 year old MTB weighs in at 16,2kg , I might need to invest in a lighter bike when I've lost some bodyweight

    Reply

  12. We don't just go up hills, we go down them as well. What about on the descent? You would expect the heavier biker to gain more speed. Would it even out? Like to see you do the test up and down and compare the results.

    Reply

  13. Recently got a full carbon Kestrel and I can tell l am a lot faster on the same routes I had ridden many times in the past on on my Aluminum bike with Carbon fork. .

    Reply

  14. After years of being a mountain bike fan,especially after the front and rear suspension systems came about, I finally said to myself I'll get a road bike just to see the difference and wow,my trip times were almost cut in half.The smaller wheel width that applies less contact/friction on the road, plus an aluminum frame,is just great.I am kind of annoyed at myself why I didn't try it sooner.I believe mountain bikes with front/rear suspensions actually absorb a lot of the kinetic energy a person applies in trying to accelerate,this is wasted energy that could be making you go faster.Forget the hype of suspensions,go for a good road bike and watch your travel times plummet.

    Reply

  15. Should have been a blind experiment, in my opinion. The flaw behind their method was that they knew how heavy the bike is before their ride, which would introduce biases in their results that lead to inaccurate conclusions. Also, they could use a placebo (i.e. a ballast that has negligible weight but the riders perceive an added weight) to examine the riders expectations of added weight, which would be quantified in their performance. Also, more riders as subjects in addition to more rides from each individual for repeated measurements. Interesting results nonetheless! 😀 I reckon I could be a consultant for the GCN experiments… Put my bachelor's degree to good use 🙂

    Reply

  16. I have managed to make my bike "lighter" by changing the wheelset. Without my saddle bag of tools it now weighs 12Kg. It's a generic 4130 steel frameset. I love steel and seriously looking at the Bombtrack Audax which is close to 10Kg. Will I notice a big difference in hill climbs?

    Reply

  17. You're missing a major point here. Not all things are equal between light and heavy riders. How much of a percentage does the bike weigh in comparison to the rider is very important. E.g. For 55kg rider a 10kg bike makes up for a massive percentage of his/her total weight, where as a 80kg rider it makes for a very small percentage of the total weight. The lighter you are the lighter the bike you needs to be to maintain the same advantage/gain as the heavier rider.

    Reply

  18. I got 9kg road bike and overtook guy on superlight new bike sitting while he was standing, if I had bike like he did he couldn't even see me I'd pass him so fast but I don't want his bike cause it's a plastic junk it was making clicking noise on every turn of the crank…

    Reply

  19. I alternate between a road bike and an ancient rigid mtb – the weight difference is only about 10lb, but the difference going up the local knackering hills is HUGE. You can make them just as knackering on the lighter bike by going faster, obviously, yet it somehow doesn't feel like such hard work – just psychological I suppose – the 'perceived' difference?

    Reply

  20. I am riding a 14,5 kg (32 pounds) bike, have a weight of 108 kg (240 pounds), two bottles of water 1,6 kg (3,76 pounds) on longer rides and a backpack (bananas, pump, inner tube, some curd snacks, extra shirt, even more water) of 3 kg (around 7 pounds). So any hill is a complete nightmare! But I love cycling 🙂

    Reply

  21. I ve been riding a Specialized Secteur sport triple (2014) with aftermarket upgraded wheels, which weighs more than 11.5kg with saddle bag but without any fluids. I have given up some climbs…

    Reply

  22. Also, rather than simply adding ballast to a bike with awesome wheels, wouldn't the weight of a cheaper heavier bike be partly in cheaper, heavier wheels?
    I'd be interested to see what sort of difference the whole package difference makes, eg heavy bike has 105 and cheaper wheels, lighter bike has Ultegra and upgraded wheelset.

    Reply

  23. When the watts were the same the difference came out to 2-3% which is what we would expect given the weight difference
    "+/- 2 Kg / 80 Kg" However I think the perceived exertion test was valid in the real world and the differences do magnify – which is why the TDF riders look like they are starving. From my own limited experience a better and lighter bike magnifies the difference on the steep sections more than the different weight would make you believe. The better bike encourages you to apply more power. Maybe it's because the faster you go, the less time you have to hold the higher wattage.

    Reply

  24. hahaha your fully loaded heavy bike is lighter than my steel frame Jamis! No wonder I fly downhill and downhill only!

    Reply

  25. why dont people train on a really heavy bike. then it would make you stronger and faster for a lightweight bike race. light bikes just make you weak

    Reply

  26. I kind of wish they would have attempted with more weight, but I guess the results still proved a point. Also would have been interesting to see some peak and average heart rate results, they kept the wattage the same for each ride, but that doesn't mean the effort was the same.

    Reply

  27. That's not a heavy bike, my commuter bike is 16.55kg. That's excluding my backpack, but including a bike lock.

    Reply

  28. I had a Trek 1997 7300 multitrack hybrid. Riding with a group of friends,they all left me behind. My breathing was heavy going up slight hills and struggled up steep hills. Ready to pass out. I since then went to a bike shop and purchased a 2014 Fuji Gran Fondo (carbon frame). Night and day to riding my old trek. All hills were a breeze my breath control was a lot better. Beat my destination time by 5mins. So happy I upgraded. Now all I want to do is beat my current time on the course. Big difference in the two bikes.

    Reply

  29. And here I am with a 60 pound bike (Nearly 30 kg). I've got a 750 watt motor on it though, which more than offsets the extra weight. It's great for commuting.

    Reply

  30. could gcn do a bike weight test with hidden ballast in downtube for example. As pyschological plays …

    Reply

  31. Ahh, I hope I find out what it feels like to ride a high end climbing bike. Mine's 12KG without the two bottles, spare tires and my bag. While I did learn to gently fly past parts where in the beginning I was destroying my knees in the lowest gear with a dangerously high heart rate, I still want to go further and faster. I think that by the time I have enough to buy that Pantani Edition Specialissima, I'll be well into my 50s.

    Reply

  32. Lmfao I have had so many arguments against morons who think double the weight makes no difference lol. Weight is 80% of the difference the rest is leg strength and bike aerodynamics. There is a reason why the Tour De France bikes are not all 29 lbs. The lineup of people at that weight of bike , well most pros would not even participate. I go up hill on a 29 lbs alloy with 25 km/ hr wind coming at me and still maintain 20 km/hr speed sitting down . Climbing is very difference than flat areas.

    Reply

  33. You guys should do an updated version of this, with climbing gears like an 11-34t or larger rear cassette.

    Reply

  34. i cycle for fitness and prefer a heavier bike as i have to work harder. I have a light road bike but i never feel like i have done a good workout on it over the same sort of distance.

    Reply

  35. My 31 mile commute is all climb, and I generally bring along my lunch, change of clothes, and laptop in my rucksack. One of these days I'll try the same route without my rucksack, it'll feel wonderful I'm sure.

    Reply

  36. You also need to do the test on the same road downhill. The heavy bike will be faster downhill.

    Reply

  37. Hay GCN my name is Avi_ban and i from Israel and I want to become part of the community of GCN and help you to grow from here also how I can to send you videos

    Reply

  38. Can you guys do a test on a complete course of uphills, downhills and flats in one ride? Would be interesting to see what the difference is then as the heavier bike would be better downhill and on the flats not that much different perhaps, especially if you end at the same point so total ups and downs would be equal.Also do the test "blind"  so you dont know which bike is the heavier one beforehand. Would be interesting

    Reply

  39. in our 13.5km up and down road, my 11.7kg road bike is 4min faster than my 16.5kg hybrid

    Reply

  40. So my light bike is about the weight of your "light" ones, but my heavy one is actually heavy, at a little over 20kg. Surprisingly, the speed differences on flat land is minimal, and in climbing I have Similar results as you guys, despite a much larger weight differential. So how does this really scale up? And what about riders' weight? I weigh in at 100kg

    Reply

  41. The speed you lose from the climb from heavy bike is made up with the speed you go downhill. A heavier bike goes downhill faster than a lighter bike.

    Reply

  42. my heavier bike (9k) is great at descending… due to the weight of course, but also due to the traditional chainring sizes on it, as apposed to my lighter bike with a compact set. I am very happy riding the backup bike; but yah, the lighter bike certainly climbs faster, and I love to climb.

    Reply

  43. So… How about a 20kg bike? xD. I wanted to see how much faster(or not) I would be if I actually got a 6kg bike

    Reply

  44. The heavy bike at 9.5kg is really not that heavy. Most bikes that cost about £1000 are that weight and that's alot of money for most people. To get your 7kg bike your looking at £3000+. Out of most people's ranges. Need more £1000 bikes in the videos!

    Reply

  45. My old bike 17kg (It was heavier before I changed some parts eg the old handlebar was like a crow bar and about 5 times heavier than the new alloy one I added. New bike 11kg. Both hybrids for day to day practical use.I still like the stability & solidness of the old bike and I carry a rucksack with 5-10kg of shopping on my back regularly (plus there is me 105kg clothed), though not up a mountain but some hills. If the lighter bike was so much better I would have thrown the old one away. BTW old bike 25 yrs old. Steel frame Raleigh. I must admit on hills it is tough so I use a 28 -26 gearing for the worst. At the other end is a 48-12 and I daren't go any faster or the brakes might not stop me, especially in wet. I wear jeans and hike boots normally so a test of something like this compared to the latest and lightest might be of interest. I'm guessing approx 50% (maybe 100% with filled rucksack) slower or thereabouts but then I only need to go half as far for the same exercise. As long as it's enjoyable I'm fine with it but I might look at some new wheels for it next which might help. You could fly me to some exotic location and I'd give it a go. Oh I did adapt the Raleigh for some aero performance which proved quite successful but if you want to see that you know what to do.

    Reply

  46. My altas bicycle weigh 20Kg steel. from india. This is only thing light to me. Also I have extra 20 Kg of luggage. So total my bike weigh about 40kg. I ride long distance. my bike cost about $100. I am not sure how can you call your bike heavy compared to mine.

    Reply

  47. What about 2 bikes that weigh the same but the wheels are of different weight. How much does unsprung weight diff affect your performance.

    Reply

  48. You say that your 35 second 2 percent saving isn't much but need to think that aero bikes with wheels etc that people bleat on sbout only improve over cheap non aero bikes by about 90 seconds over 40km at same power so you to gain 35 sec over 8km in 21 mins dhows that weight even on shallow 7 percent gradients just as important as being aero especially bearing in mind over most long runs many slopes and gradients that weight will be more of a factor than aero.

    Reply

  49. If you're cycling to get fit and strong may as well get a stronger, heavier bike that will make you fitter and stringer and has far less environmental impact, last longer, wears better and will biodegrade faster once it's life is over.

    Reply

  50. Is 1kilo really important or
    grams??? u cant feel it when your riding it.. unless its 3 to 5 kilos heavier

    Reply

  51. Anyone here with a bike heavier than mine? 20kg without anything. I've just started to cycle over weekends. last weekend 70km this weekend ~40km(a lot of uphill). Hopefully I will get a lighter bike soon…ish. Wonder how it will feel going from this one to a lighter one. Ps.pretty shitty video

    Reply

  52. This video is not helping me
    Because my bicycle is 18.8 kg no joke and the bike I'm considering is 12.3 kg
    I'm not even kidding

    Reply

  53. I think perhaps the better test would have been to hide the weight under the seat and have the heavy bike unknown.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *