6 Cars We’re Ashamed To Admit We Once Liked!

6 Cars We’re Ashamed To Admit We Once Liked!


SUBSCRIBE FOR WEEKLY VIDEOS ►
FOLLOW ME ON INSTAGRAM ►

I don’t know about you but there are many things I once thought were so cool in the past and as I got older I was like “What was I thinking?” That includes cars as well. In this video I’ll be featuring 6 cars most of us are probably ashamed to have had liked before.

Business Inquiries: [email protected]

Follow me on social media!

Facebook:

Twitter:

Instagram: s

100 Comments on "6 Cars We’re Ashamed To Admit We Once Liked!"


  1. Hey, even though the eclipse sucks I still like it lol. I also still really like Hummers.

    Reply

  2. Bruh, the eclipse was one of the most tunable cars of its time and was very manageable for costs of parts and repairs. It may have had issues, but that can be said about nearly any car that was popular

    Reply

  3. The PT, Hummer, X-Type, Celica (the later models) Never ever liked them. You showed Eclipses that were completely different. Different drivetrains body styles. Missed the previous Generation before the crossover as well. I drove a GSX it was a really fun car. They take to Mods well. The convertible you showed was a decent car but FWD and that tired V6 was pretty gutless the 4 cylinder even worse. Along with feeling like a really cheaply made vehicle. The next generation again probably way too expensive. And boooo! FWD, but the Mivec V6 had balls. The 4 cylinder 4g69 was peppy, Transmission problems were limited to the Automatics, The standard versions are nearly bulletproof. The Celica looked cheap and if I remember, was soo overpriced. The GTS had the Yamaha tuned engine and accelerated o.k. at high rpms but like most V tech engines from Honda, it was pretty gutless until the VVTI (toyota) RPM range was reached. Anyway most of these cars are not cars I ever liked. No shame bro. Lol

    Reply

  4. check out this band called Lemon Disco. great music to play while driving.
    https://lemondisco.bandcamp.com/album/interstellar

    Reply

  5. The bottom spec eclipse, i'm fine with admitting was bad. But tbh the gsx and gst hauled ass on the track. It's no match for the stang on the DRAG STRIP, not Laguna Seca.

    Reply

  6. I've been an ASE Master Tech and car builder for more than two decades. You were dead on with some of your picks and way off with others, but a list such as this is based on subjective criteria…based on opinion.

    The 2nd Gen Eclipse did suffer from a cheaply made interior as well as the 2.0 4cyl(RS and GS models) being underpowered from the factory. The engine was the same 4cyl found in the Neon and Stratus. BUT, with a few in depth engine mods as well as suspension upgrades, the 2nd Gen Eclipse could compete with any tuner car of the time.
    The Celica's only drawback was the price versus performance…you could get better performing cars for the money at the time. But, just like with the previously mentioned 2nd Gen Eclipse, with a few mods and upgrades the Celica could easily be the performance king-of-the-hill on your local tuner car scene at the time. But, unlike the 2nd Gen Eclipse, the Celica was famously dependable and well built.
    I give you an A for effort, a B- for research, a C for specific knowledge, and a F for failure to recognize then state lists such as these are totally subjective. Good try though.

    Reply

  7. I think for the Eclipse you're talking about the non-turbo version. And you said the only real appeal was their looks? Not the 4G63T engine which could withstand a lot of boost and was easy to modify?

    The REAL issue with the 2nd gen Eclipses was crankwalk. Surprised you didn't mention that at all…

    Reply

  8. So I agreed with you on the first two: PT Cruiser and Jaguar. I never liked H2s and not an Acura/Honda fan. Now, those last Celicas, as long as they are GT-S, I won’t mind to get my hands off n one of them. Now, let’s discuss the Eclipses (1st and 2nd gens), if they have the 4G63 engines, they can be a real deal, but they also can suck your pants along with your wallet!!

    Reply

  9. Everything is wrong in this video, from year release to comparison… Eagle Talon and Celica? What they have in common again?

    Reply

  10. The eclipse has a 4g63 or a 3.8l v6… even the base model ones are still fast for your first car

    Reply

  11. I 💓 low (roof height) coupes. Closest you can get now to AWD Eclipse is $115k Porsche! And not too hard getting 4g63t to same power.
    Never liked PT, Hummer or TL.

    Reply

  12. You got it wrong on the TL. At least the one I got was pretty sweet: 2007 TL Type-S. Great looking car IMO. Decent performance. No real issues. Just maintenance.

    Reply

  13. You got it wrong on the TL. At least the one I got was pretty sweet: 2007 TL Type-S. Great looking car IMO. Decent performance. No real issues. Just maintenance.

    Reply

  14. In – famous….wow, this guy reads at a second grade level, please, get someone else to do the voiceovers, you pause at the wrong parts when you speak, horrible

    Reply

  15. The 1g and 2g Eclipse are iconic vehicles capable of making extraordinary power. Bone stock/ unmolested 1g and 2g eclipses are extremely sought after. Same goes for any 3g Acura TL Type S especially with a 6MT. Good luck finding one even with over 100k on it for less than 10k to 12k. Yes your avg 3g TL might have some issues with its tranny but the stock 3.2 is very very reliable and the 3.5 in the type s is as well. These 2 vehicles should be no where near this list. C'mon man if your an enthusiast and not someone who can go by an M3, Supra, or something else that will run you over 15k-30k before you even start your build these 2 cars are awesome daily drivers or projects. Get with it man. Horrible reviews. Smh

    Reply

  16. People liked the Hummer because of its road dominance and presence. People enjoyed the fact that could actually run over almost any vehicle on the road and also withstand a roadside bomb. Not to mention a Zombie ( or crack head) apocalypse.

    Reply

  17. The Supra was in Fast & Furious not the Celica and the eclipse gsx have more horsepower in a Mustang gt n was 2 sec faster in the 1/4

    Reply

  18. Celica is still the best sport car ever made. is the force. i will never be hater, like you.

    Reply

  19. As asked for in the video, here is some hate. You sound like a failed rapper! Take a breather and slow the f down.

    Reply

  20. The eclipse is still cool. You just dont know shit about cars. Point proven when you said the celica is the same as an eagle talon… which is also cool.

    Reply

  21. After 10min and 9sec i am absolutely convinced 100% that you know absolutely nothing about cars.

    Reply

  22. I Own a GT & GTS Celica – proud owner of both – 1 for the road – 2 For the car meets 🔥 – Celicas & other cars on this list should not be here but just by seen you I can expected nothing less.. 🤭

    But Hey I’m just a viewer right? 🏌️

    Reply

  23. I've had a 2008 Acura TL for 4 years, got great price. I didn't have great expectations. It is a decent car. The engine power is impressive.

    Reply

  24. HAHA! AWESOME VIDEO BUT I DISAGREE WITH THE CELICA and the TL .They were awesome and the high end model was cool in both ( tl-s type)…..

    Reply

  25. Dude shut up please!! Eclipse slow cars! Celicas in fast and the furious ! This guy is an idiot!

    Reply

  26. woah…… chill with the eclipse lol, that's a legend my guy. can't agree with that one lol.

    Reply

  27. never had a problem with my first gen eclipse the trans held up to everything i threw at it.

    Reply

  28. The 2nd gen gs and gst were monster machines and the célica is a true tuner car as well you can do many things to it to make it faster smh definitely don’t know if I do or don’t like your page

    Reply

  29. A bunch of lies on the TL. The 2005-2008 TL is a great car.
    1. TOUCH SCREEN navigation on a large BUILT-IN display integrated into the audio system with no cords hanging down that is not locked out because you're on the interstate.
    2. Sporty looks with a great shape. Todays sedans under 50k have zero sexiness.
    3. Good accerlation and a SOFT touch interior. It's a car you don't want to get out of.
    4. Dedicated audio, navigation and climate control buttons that were not made by a nerd.
    4. An engine that does not shut off when you come to a stop sign.
    5. A shifter that you hold not a stupid set of push buttons you look down at.
    6. The pre 2005 TLs have the older weaker transmission. Never buy the first model year.
    7. I have 300k on the original engine/transmission. Acura Brookfield did all fluid changes.
    8. I have no cracked dash and no interior rattling.

    Reply

  30. Why does everyone forgot the 95 and below eclipse offered all wheel drive and was one of the most mod able cars around and was kinda the reason the tuner culture started up in the early 2000s thanks to the fast and the furious

    Reply

  31. Lol, you got my view, and the comments were worth it. If anything ford mustangs need to be on this list, not the 4G63T.

    Reply

  32. Obviously made by someone who has not got a clue about what makes a car legendary or a flunk. should have spent a allot more time researching.Why would you bother making this video when your obviously not into cars.

    Reply

  33. AC running DOES decrease mileage. The power to run the compressor comes from the engine. I lost 2 mpg when running the compressor, which increased as soon as I turned off the solenoid on the compressor pully.

    Reply

  34. My buddy had an 06 TL stick and never had interiors issues cause he would detail it him self every week or 2 and he drove it like a hoonigan and burnt less oil then my 08 civic

    Reply

  35. Don't agreed with the celica and the eclipse had mechanical issues but had power and speed.

    Reply

  36. "the Toyota Celica in fast and furious" this was in fast and furious for 1 second so what's the point and its not "cellica" its "Celica" the I is pronounced like an E if a real car enthusiast was doing this video they wouldn't put the Celica or the Eclipse in the list and "the PT Cruiser is ugly and it was introduced in 2000" not 2005

    Reply

  37. He didn't crap on any of my favs growing up.
    Toyota Supra
    Subaru WRX
    BMW 3 series
    Nissan Skyline
    Any of those are still bad ass to this day.

    Reply

  38. I had a muscle car just out of high school, but I respected my buddy's white modded Eclipse turbo that could beat a lot of ass and looked pretty hot back in the day.

    The Celica was definitely a chick car though. Right up there with the Jetta. A buddy bought one and was pissed he was always getting checked out by dudes looking to peep the hot chick driver. Lol

    Reply

  39. He doesnt mean to trigger us he only speaks of facts and how unreliable they are now compare to cars today (but I'm not embarrassed that I like most of the cars.)

    Reply

  40. I don't care what kind of car it is, if it's a mint example, it looks waaaaay cooler than some new sedan today. If I see a mint Geo Metro with original everything it looks cool rolling down the road.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *